Pilgrim,<br><br>I went back and checked the book that contains Samuel Miller’s paper as an appendix. What I thought was an article was actually just an excerpt from Miller's book "Infant Baptism Scriptural and Reasonable.” Essentially the excerpt demonstrates the confirming evidence we would expect to see from church history. The following quote from Miller sums his historical argument up pretty well. "That the church should have passed from the practice of none but adult baptism, to that of the constant and universal baptism of infants, while such a change was utterly unknown, and never heard of, by the most active, pious, and learned men that lived during that period, cannot, I must believe, be imagined by any impartial mind." In other words, if the the universal practice of the early church was to baptize only adults, why then can't we find even a blip on the screen of church history for such a radical change to the universal practice of baptizing infants?<br><br>Thanks!<br><br>Ron<br>