<blockquote><font size=1>In reply to:</font><hr>[color:"blue"] The entire paedobaptist position rests upon these two verses and their interpretation. </font><hr></blockquote><p><br><br>This is incorrect. The paedo-batist argument has many scriptures hinting towards a continuance of the familial covenant. It has a continuity of both testaments in regards to the visible/invisible church. It has an argument for inclusion of all under the covenant sign. It has 1500 years of practice to help it out as well. <br><br><br>God bless,<br><br>william<br><br>