<blockquote><font size=1>In reply to:</font><hr>[color:"blue"]Actually you never answered my first set of questions at all. Tis not a petty converstation at all. you just made some claims and assumptions without having full knowledge of the situation. Joe and others have already been pointing out to you Nee's errors that you keep denying. When asked to give scriptural examples, you call it legalistic</font><hr></blockquote><p><br>What was your first questions?<br>What claims and assumptions?<br>What knowledge do you think I am missing?<br>I have corrected their view of Nee to show where they misunderstood. Having read Nee I know their claims are false. When you read Nee you don't get this indication at all they claim. When asked to give scriptural examples "I call it legalistic" why do you say that about me?