I am ignorant of what? can you be more specific. What other statements did I make that are false? Of course God can't sin, but the choice is there to sin just like it exists for us like it did for Satan like it did for all that had a choice to do so. But God never did and never will, which is why He is God. How am I equating the doctrine of God with fatalism? I defined fatalism from the dictionary - what was wrong with that definition?
Neat article, neat read. It is one grand rationalization process where at the end of the day that little boy is saved because he is a child but if he is a man lets say God examines heart to see if He accepts God. Did his heart accept Christ or not unto salvation again not because of Gods boardgame predistation but God's freewill in that man (boy)'s heart to accept God's way or not.
As Watchman Nee states this is a fine article of "mental gymnastics" and that is all calvanism and everytime I read a calvanist article it is always the same. This one is trying to make fatalisim different from Predestination and yet the same.
"natural force" is not man's free will. man's free will is God's force. Why? Because who gave man that free will to begin with? Do you see?
Pentecostals are just the opposite though strikingly the same. That is why I call Pentecostals calvanists.
So you guys are all calvanist pentecostals (loss of free will gibbeshers) or pentecostal calvnists (loss of free will non-gibberishers).
You guys are both the same and have the same thing in common. Destruction of free will and an open door to passivity.
With free will that refuses mombo jumbo gibberish and a free will that says they believe God when He says "those who believe unto the Son can come to the Father" refusing predestination fatalism (boardgame) then man can be active and not passive in Christ, and truly saved and reap the full benefits of the redemptive design.
