Regarding the Trinity... a man-made doctrine created in 180 AD. Question: what purpose has it served spiritually and historically (intent and fruits) to introduce this man-made explanation/image of a God who is beyond man’s explanation?

Act 17:29 -- Forasmuch then as we are the offspring of God, we ought not to think that the Godhead is like unto gold, or silver, or stone, graven by art and man's device.


With mankind’s long track record of sinful deceit and poly-theism is the worry that falsity might take root... The approved elders of the early Christian Councils came up with ‘Trinity’ to explain God... When the Bible states ‘The Lord is One’... When Jesus himself states, "He that has seen me, has seen the father" (John 14:9)"

Yet/Still with the grave likelihood that man was standing on seriously shaky ground... with chisel and stone and philosophy, came his need to define the ‘mystery’ of God’s likeness/image... when no one asked him to. You may say this is human nature... Indeed!

To come up with such a ‘doctrine’ is man’s vain attempt to mess with what he should not have messed with. What should be added? (Nothing.) God said so! What possible purpose does this added doctrine serve... but to create the hint of separation between the Father and the Son... and allow for the degeneration of the deity of Jesus.


HOLY, HOLY, HOLY is THE LORD GOD, THE ALMIGHTY, WHO WAS AND WHO IS AND WHO IS TO COME." Rev. 1:8


“He who denies the Son, does not even have the Father”... This verse can only be realized by way of the Trinity doctrine... open-the-door-a little-bit theory. The additional ‘helpful’ Trinity explantation/image of God allows the basis and support to define the two-covenant Dispensational view, as well. Dispensationalist teaching is contrary to Grace; a further erosion of the Truth. If, rather... we believe Jesus Christ, that He and the Father are one. Period. There is no possibility of making the claim to the Father without knowledge of his Son. (I’m thinking of some amazing statements Dispensationalist and NON-Dispensationalist believers have made... that whether or not the people who wrote them are aware... can only have been written by not comprehending fully Jesus’ own words about himself.)


2Cr 4:6 -- For God, who commanded the light to shine out of darkness, hath shined in our hearts, to [give] the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ.


Act 5:42 -- And daily in the temple, and in every house, they ceased not to teach and preach Jesus Christ.


You may quote scriptures until Tuesday that speak of the relationship of the ‘God-head’ (a term Paul used.) And I say that is fine... stick with those. Triune and Trinity and ‘Trinity doctrine’ aren’t of the scriptures... They are added. That Paul used the term ‘God-head’... fine. Does that give us the right to make a ‘God-head doctrine?’ and stamp it approved.


You leave the commandment of God and hold to the tradition of men." -- Mark 5:8


If you were to ask me if I believe in the doctrine of the Trinity... I will quote Jesus,
"He that has seen me, has seen the father" (John 14:9)"


And why would anyone even ask the question?


Act 4:12
Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved.


History and Fruits, and adding a word... Man’s attempt to define ‘God’ by council. Intent. The list goes on . . .