Quote
Kathy said:
Yes, I do have objections and problems with the doctrine and its conclusions.

Okay. Thanks. But are you saying that your objections are because of what you initially said or something else?

Here's why I ask. There's a difference between having a real problem with the rationale of something and saying something is "beyond comprehension." Something can be logical and beyond comprehension. But I am unclear as to whether you object because the doctrine has a propositional problem (like something is a and non-a at the same time and in the same relationship) or if there is a problem like, "I Just don't understand this. I cannot fully comprehend this." For example, God is infinite and beyond comprehension; however, that does not mean we cannot know things about Him.

At the same time, the doctrine of the Trinity can easily be laid out logically. But, you cannot picture a triune God. You cannot fully comprehend Him. But you also cannot throw it out on those grounds alone, either.

Just a thought...(I do not argue for the Trinity on these grounds, just trying to help you think about it.)

Last edited by TheHinge; Sun Jul 17, 2005 7:25 AM.