Quote
beloved57 said:


My point is sir that in leading up to that subject, paul refers to the gospel message that he preached to them in the past. Do you agree ? And he stated that the gospel message that he preached concerned how that christ died for our ( the brethern, the elect, the sheep, the chosen ones, the children God gave me , those that the father gave me)sins. Sir all I am saying is that the gospel that paul preached contained the truth of limited atonement ! I don`t apologize for that, trust me. Thats the word of God.

Now me, I don`t understand how someone was converted before they believed the gospel which liited atonement is part of according to paul, in fact in practically every sermon that is preached in acts !

The answer lies within your response. ANY AND EVERY TIME we start a sentence with "I dont understand" the statement this claim is made against is true.

Just because YOU dont understand it does not make it false Darryl.

You also assume that everyone Paul preached to could read and had a copy of all his letters. Where is limted atonement in his letter to Philemon? I am sure you can find it with the lenses you use, but it is not there. So was Paul unregenerate at the time he wrote this letter? If you want to discuss 1 Cor 15, then stay there. You do not need to muddy the waters with acts.

Paul spoke about the resurrection and the second advent more than limited atonement, yet for some odd reason one can have misunderstandings on the eschaton and still be regenerate, but let one be a tad amis on speaking your shibboleth of limited atonement, and they are lost.

Next time you would like to start a thread with a question, provide the answer YOU ALREADY have before imitating a wolf with wool

There never was a sinner half as big as Christ is as a Savior.