Quote
Joe k said:
Quote
Pilgrim said:
Are you sure you didn't intend your reply to Ruth to be posted on some other Arminian Board? <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/rofl.gif" alt="" /> <cut>

I confess those also Pilgrim. There is nothing "Arminian" about my response.
I apologize for the lack of clarity. I was pressed for time.

Show me where I spoke in a pellagian matter please.
Joe,

Please READ [Linked Image] what I wrote. I said your response was better suited to be posted on an Arminian Board because 1) it was totally irrelevant to anything that Ruth wrote in reply to you. Why? Because what she wrote was classic biblical Calvinism, which you apparently either ignored, misunderstood, didn't read, or ???? and 2) it would have been a good apologetic against Arminianism (to which we too are opposed, in case you didn't realize that even after reading through the Forum Guidelines, where it is clearly stated this Board and website are decidedly REFORMED/CALVINISTS) <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" />

In His Grace,

[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]