Thanks for the answer. I think it may help to understand a little about logic. I apologize if everyone has already said this to you.

The Doctrine of the Trinity does not say, "3=1." It says there are three persons,three distinct loci of consciousness, that share the same nature. They say God is a. one is nature and b. three in person. This way they do not say God is A and non-A in the same way and in the same relationship (i.e. a contradiction).

I think you are trying to "picture" God, the Trinitarian God, in some way and you will end up with three God's if you try and do that in our time-space, 3d continuum.

Having said this, it looks like your hermeneutic begins, not ends, but begins with the idea of the contradiction of the Trinity and that therefore the Biblical data must mean something else. I believe in essence, and respectfully, you are putting the cart before the horse.

That is why the more I study and see this precious doctrine I can see how faithful the old saints in history were to uphold the doctrine. The really, faithfully took the data they had and expressed that in the doctrine of the Trinity.

I hope this helps and that it does not insult you.