Quote
CovenantInBlood said:
Quote
xyz said:
Quote
CovenantInBlood said:
Quote
xyz said:

It is acceptable if one is without sin. But, because the Christ is the Christ because he alone is without sin, rejection is unacceptable, even folly. One may, like the 'blind' Pharisees, say that one does not sin, and that living a decent, law-abiding life is enough; or one may openly accept that one is a sinner, and even accept that Jesus' propitiation is effective, but refuse to give up the riches and 'pleasures' of this passing world. Either way, to reject Christ's sacrifice is to commit the unforgivable sin, unrepentance, and put oneself under law and therefore condemnation.

(Scriptural support for unrepentance being the unforgiveable sin?)

So Christ's propitiation is not effective for the unrepentant. This being the case, was it Christ's intention to die on behalf of the unrepentant?
Christ died for all sins, past, present, future, so that no-one can claim impunity against God.

Quote
And if so, did Christ fail in His mission?
Christ died for all sins, past, present, future, so that no-one can claim impunity against God.

You've reiterated yourself, but you haven't answered my questions.

Was it Christ's intention to die on behalf of the unrepentant, yes or no? If yes: Did Christ fail in His mission since His propitiation is not effective for the unrepentant, yes or no?
Who decides what is effective? Christ died for all sins, past, present, future, so that no-one can claim impunity against God.